'Descartes and Plato Essay\r'

'Explain both of descartes Arguments for the cosmos of graven image Descartes proof of everlasting(a)ion’s existence comes from his ordinal venture and is based on three ideas. He argues that innate idea exists within us, the fictitious or invented ideas are a result of our own vision and adventitious ideas result from our experiences in the world. Descartes said, the idea of immortal is innate and lavatorynot be invented. Descartes presents some bloods that lead to his conclusion.\r\nThe eldest argument is that nothing can result to something and the military campaign of an idea give always convey a nominal naive realism because the idea must have an objective reality. He argues that if an undivided have God, hence the idea has an mea certainlyless objective reality and therefore, the individual cannot be the cause of the idea, because he is not inexhaustible or a perfective being or he doesn’t have enough formal reality. It’s totally a per fect and infinite being who can be the cause of the idea. therefrom, God as an infinite reality must exist. A perfect being, is appealing and good; implying that God is benevolent and would not deceive or allow reservation errors without giving a way of correcting the errors.\r\nThe second argument Descartes gives is based on the premise that I exist, and my existence must have a cause. He gives the barely possible causes are: my existence, existence of something less perfect than God and existence of God. Out of this Descartes argues that if I had created myself, I would have created myself perfect and that if my existence have a cause, then it doesn’t solve the problem. If I’m not an independent being, then I would necessity the sustenance of another being. And that the perfection in me could not originate from a less perfect being.\r\nTherefore God exists. Descartes second proof of God’s existence is based on the fifth meditation on essence of material o bjects and it’s called the ontological argument. Descartes identifies external objects that can either be plain and clear or obscure and confused. Descartes argues that without some(prenominal) sure knowledge of existence of a supreme and perfect being it would be impossible to have any assurance of any truth. Descartes defined God as an infinitely perfect being and that perfection will include existence. Meaning therefore, God exists.\r\nExplain the fable of the Cave and relate it to Platos metaphysical and epistemological guess The emblem of counteract is round prisoners who have pass their lives chained to the protect of a cave and go about the wall. The prisoners are watching shadows cast on the wall by objects passing in front of the sunburn behind them, and they start to attribute the forms of these shadows. It is a analogical show of how a man is trapped in the illusion of material existence and how he can renounce himself from such trappings by philosop hical thoughts of personal and social awareness through constant self examination.\r\nThese shadows are the close the prisoners can admit to reality. When the one who actually is able to free himself from the cave, returns backrest to the cave to tell his fellow man about the world outside the cave he is ridiculed for his free thoughts by the ones not knowing the real truth yet. Thats how a philosopher feels, he is like the prisoner who has freed himself from the cave and realizes that shadows on the wall are not the reality of things in life but merely shadows.\r\nThis allegory of the cave is related to Plato’s theory of Metaphysics and Epistemology. Seen as an epistemological account, it attempts to determine the importance of ideas which we can only comprehend through reason resulting from our experiences from the physical world. The allegory of the cave is a philosopher’s effort to square away the society which can be seen as prisoners, incarcerate by their da rk ignorance. The cave could represent our occasional experiences and how we always accept the dictates of the society without questioning them.\r\n'